- From: dorian taylor <dorian.taylor.lists@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:30:56 -0700
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: public-xhtml2@w3.org
Shane, On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > Thanks for your comments. > > As it turns out, the working group resolved recently to revert the content > model of Meta back to its XHTML 1 form more or less, so there is no PCDATA > nor Text permitted within meta. Also, meta is no longer permitted in the > body. Consequently, we believe this particular item is no longer in > conflict. Thank you for your reply. I agree that it is wise to avoid constructs that compete for semantics. A distinct benefit I recognized of adding a content model to the meta element was that I could describe, however narrowly, an XMLLiteral triple without it being part of the body. Suppose, for example, I wanted to describe a dc:abstract for the document that contained markup, but for one reason or another I didn't want it to be susceptible to rendering. Is that construct still available? Regards, -- Dorian Taylor http://doriantaylor.com/
Received on Saturday, 11 April 2009 16:31:34 UTC