- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 21:37:20 +0900
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com, W3C Validator Community <www-validator@w3.org>
Shane McCarron wrote:
>
>
> Felix Sasaki wrote:
>> at
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/NOTE-xml-i18n-bp-20080213/#integration-its-xhtmlmod
>> . At least you ("you" meaning your working group) said it is
>> conforming during your review of it.
> I had forgotten you had put this together - thanks! Unfortunately you
> do not appear to have created a DTD implementation of the module. I
> will do that for you today.
oh, thank you!
> I note that you provide an example markup language that is xhtml basic
> 1.0 + ITS. Is that what you want created in DTD form for the
> validator? Or would you prefer XHTML 1.1 + ITS? I think the later
> would be more interesting to a broader community than xhtml basic 1.0.
this is really hard for me to judge. What do others think?
Felix
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2008 12:38:13 UTC