- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:42:07 +0100
- To: "XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
- Cc: "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>
Here is my proposed text for the CSS Namespaces last call comment from the XHTML2 WG. Steven ======= Dear CSS WG, In the context of the following @namespace "http://example.org/ns" foo {color: green} with a non-namespaced CSS processor all elements named foo will be green, while with a namespaced processor, only elements in the namespace named will be green. This seems to break an axiom of CSS versioning that later versions of CSS should not change the processing of earlier versions; it will therefore make it hard to make a stylesheet that works regardless of the presence of namespace processing. It would seem better if unqualified names continue to behave in the same way as non-namespaced processors, and that to select a particular namespaced version of an element, you should always use a qualified name. Best wishes, Steven Pemberton For the XHTML2 WG
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 15:42:15 UTC