- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:57:28 +0200
- To: "Roland Merrick" <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:38:22 +0200, Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com> wrote: > The script element will support an additional attribute: "implements" > > implements attribute is defined as follows: > the implements attributes specifies that the script identified by the > @src > provides an implementation of the specified namespace. The script should > only be loaded and used if the user agent does not have an implementation > of the specified namespace. > > example: > <script src="xmlEvents2.js" type="...." implements=" > http://www.w3.org/2001/xml-events" /> > > Question 1: is this what the participants thought was agreed? Yes, except that it isn't just @src, but also the contents of the script element. > Question 2: if it was, then is a namespace not too coarse a unit? Should > we identify features within a namespace, perhaps a feature might be > equivalent to an XHTML module. We didn't discuss more than the namespace. I'd personally be happy with the namespace (I think), but I'd be happy to discuss it. > Question 3: how, if it all, does this relate to the DOM hasFeature > method? Also needs discussion. I have no answers at present. Steven > [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/02/19-xhtml-minutes.html#item03 > > Regards, Roland > FBCS, CITP > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 > 3AU > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 12:58:03 UTC