- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:29:14 -0400
- To: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
- Cc: wai-liaison@w3.org
[switched Cc: address for PFWG] The message I just sent http://www.w3.org/mid/90A2E5E5-853C-4876-965E-42FC3AA7FD49@IEEE.org was addressed to wai-xtech in lieu of w3c-wai-pf. As the material I am responding to is all in the publicly-visible archives, the wai-xtech list is a preferred forum for follow-up discussions where there is no Member dependency in the remarks. Al <quote cite="http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/charter200612#Communication"> Discussions that are relevant to the PFWG scope and do not depend on W3C Member Confidential sources should be addressed to the publicly archived mailing list with email address wai-xtech@w3.org. </quote> On 7 Apr 2008, at 1:56 PM, Mark Birbeck wrote: > > Hello all, > > I've been asked to forward these comments to those involved in ARIA. > Obviously I am happy to do that, but I would just say that I think > some of my comments relate to exactly what @role is all about, and > therefore raise some conceptual issues. > > In other words, I think there may need to be some parallel discussion > over on the XHTML 2 list, about exactly how the values that are > 'imported' into the XHTML vocab list should be structured. [disclaimer: haven't reviewed the archives for any such. I just have a few clarifications to suggest, not an exhaustive response.] > <snip/>
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 17:30:12 UTC