- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:47:01 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- cc: XHTML2 WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
On 17 Oct, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
> Sorry, I meant xhtml 2 working goup. There is no "xhtml working group."
> BTW if you click the link to XHTML on the W3C web site it goes the the
> XHTML 2 working group.
Now /that/ is going overboard on the semantics. We all know the
reference was to the "XHTML 2 WG", and correcting that is really
unnecessary.
> I have to say I think you are going a bit overboard. We have bigger
> problems here than the semantics of the subject line.
I disagree. The subject-line is the first indication of the content
that someone will have when reading mail. It is extremely important.
To me, the supplied subject suggest a formal meeting. That is why I
asked where the announcement was - I have yet to receive an answer.
Let us turn our attention to other things. Quote:
"I am trying to schedule another meeting which includes Steven. You and
Shane are both welcome."
Am I - or anyone else on the WG - as welcome, and this just a very,
very unfortunate way of phrasing?
The CC-list has been cut to the XHTML WG.
--
- Tina Holmboe Developer's Archive Greytower Technologies
http://www.dev-archive.net http://www.greytower.net
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 21:47:34 UTC