- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:43:45 +0100
- To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: "olivier Thereaux" <ot@w3.org>, "XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Hi Shane, I hope that you are only just arriving home after a wild night out. :) I'll also take a look in the minutes and on the lists, but if you come across those references before I do, please let me know. Thanks. Regards, Mark On 02/10/2007, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > The resolution of the working group was that we needed to continue to > say that XHTML-M12N based markup languages, including XHTML 1.1, SHOULD > be served as application/xhtml+xml - we do not prohibit their being > served other ways. There was a discussion at the f2f in Cannes about > changing this to text/html, and a draft was produced that said that. > However, there were many strong objections to it and the working group > instructed me to change it back. I am sure I could find the references, > but its like 5 AM here and I am not at the top of my game. > > Mark Birbeck wrote: > > Hi Shane, > > > > My memory of this discussion is that we came down the other. :) I.e., > > we decided _against_ the enforcement of a media type of > > 'application/xhtml+xml', and supported allowing people to use > > 'text/html'. > > > > In my view there is little to gain from insisting on an XML media type > > for XHTML. MIME types have been increasingly hijacked over the years > > to designate a preferred processing application, rather than a > > document type. This isn't likely to change any time soon, so we might > > as well live with it. In which case it would be far better to leave > > the 'processing application' designation as 'an HTML or XHTML > > renderer' (i.e., as 'text/html'), and leave it up to authors and > > publishing systems to indicate the _document type_ through other > > mechanisms (such as DOCTYPE, @xmlns, @profile, or whatever techniques > > can be devised). > > > > Regards, > > > > Mark > > > > On 02/10/2007, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > > > >> Note that there are updated drafts of ALL XHTML Working Group specs > >> available via http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts. > >> > >> Yes, that text has been changed. See, for example, > >> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-xhtml11-20070416/conformance.html#strict > >> > >> > >> > >> olivier Thereaux wrote: > >> > >>> (apologies, had originally mailed the wrong list) > >>> > >>> Hello, XHTML WG, > >>> > >>> Could you tell the status of this paragraph in the XHTML 1.1 spec? The > >>> latest working draft (Feb 2007... getting old) states that XHTML 1.1 > >>> SHOULD be served as text/html (or app/xhtml+xml) and this is confusing > >>> people. > >>> > >>> I think I recall a message from Shane saying this was a typo, but could > >>> not find it in either www-html-editor (could only find a few reports > >>> of the issue, but no answer from the WG), nor in www-html, nor in > >>> www-validator where I thought this had been raised. Other echoes I got > >>> seem to show this was actually on purpose. > >>> > >>> Is there any public record of what will happen to this statement in the > >>> next draft? > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> -- olivier > >>> > >>> ----- Forwarded message from Rado Faletic <rado.faletic@anu.edu.au> ----- > >>> > >>> From: Rado Faletic <rado.faletic@anu.edu.au> > >>> To: www-validator@w3.org > >>> X-Archived-At: > >>> http://www.w3.org/mid/AB7951B9-369C-4F87-862A-95C110BE1691@anu.edu.au > >>> > >>> > >>> note that in the XHTML1.1 working draft (16 Feb 2007) it says the > >>> following: > >>> XHTML 1.1 documents SHOULD be labeled with the Internet Media Type > >>> text/html as defined in [RFC2854] or application/xhtml+xml as defined > >>> in [RFC3236]. > >>> > >>> [snip] > >>> > >>> ----- End Forwarded Message ----- > >>> > >>> > >> -- > >> Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > >> Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > >> ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > > > -- Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com standards. innovation.
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 10:43:55 UTC