Re: XHTML 1.1 (Feb 2007 WD) as text/html?

Note that there are updated drafts of ALL XHTML Working Group specs 
available via http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts.

Yes, that text has been changed.  See, for example, 
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-xhtml11-20070416/conformance.html#strict



olivier Thereaux wrote:
>
> (apologies, had originally mailed the wrong list)
>
> Hello, XHTML WG,
>
> Could you tell the status of this paragraph in the XHTML 1.1 spec? The
> latest working draft (Feb 2007... getting old) states that XHTML 1.1
> SHOULD be served as text/html (or app/xhtml+xml) and this is confusing
> people.
>
> I think I recall a message from Shane saying this was a typo, but could
> not find it in either www-html-editor (could only find a few reports
> of the issue, but no answer from the WG), nor in www-html, nor in
> www-validator where I thought this had been raised. Other echoes I got
> seem to show this was actually on purpose.
>
> Is there any public record of what will happen to this statement in the
> next draft?
>
> Thanks!
> -- olivier
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Rado Faletic <rado.faletic@anu.edu.au> -----
>
> From: Rado Faletic <rado.faletic@anu.edu.au>
> To: www-validator@w3.org
> X-Archived-At: 
> http://www.w3.org/mid/AB7951B9-369C-4F87-862A-95C110BE1691@anu.edu.au
>
>
> note that in the XHTML1.1 working draft (16 Feb 2007) it says the
> following:
> XHTML 1.1 documents SHOULD be labeled with the Internet Media Type
> text/html as defined in [RFC2854] or application/xhtml+xml as defined
> in [RFC3236].
>
> [snip]
>
> ----- End Forwarded Message -----
>

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com

Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 10:07:38 UTC