- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:44:23 +0900
- To: XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
(apologies, had originally mailed the wrong list) Hello, XHTML WG, Could you tell the status of this paragraph in the XHTML 1.1 spec? The latest working draft (Feb 2007... getting old) states that XHTML 1.1 SHOULD be served as text/html (or app/xhtml+xml) and this is confusing people. I think I recall a message from Shane saying this was a typo, but could not find it in either www-html-editor (could only find a few reports of the issue, but no answer from the WG), nor in www-html, nor in www-validator where I thought this had been raised. Other echoes I got seem to show this was actually on purpose. Is there any public record of what will happen to this statement in the next draft? Thanks! -- olivier ----- Forwarded message from Rado Faletic <rado.faletic@anu.edu.au> ----- From: Rado Faletic <rado.faletic@anu.edu.au> To: www-validator@w3.org X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/ AB7951B9-369C-4F87-862A-95C110BE1691@anu.edu.au note that in the XHTML1.1 working draft (16 Feb 2007) it says the following: XHTML 1.1 documents SHOULD be labeled with the Internet Media Type text/html as defined in [RFC2854] or application/xhtml+xml as defined in [RFC3236]. [snip] ----- End Forwarded Message -----
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 04:44:33 UTC