- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:33:06 +0900
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, XHTML WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Le 19 avr. 2007 à 20:10, Dan Brickley a écrit :
> Karl Dubost wrote:
>> We might issue a warning on this. Saying be careful you have a
>> conflict between the meta name and the http headers for your mime
>> type.
>
> Is it really a conflict? Can a piece of content not genuinely fall
> in two categories at once? Or is the rule that, even if this is
> true in the abstract, ... for each HTTP transaction, there must be
> exactly one mime type for the content.
1. The HTTP mime type MUST have precedence on everything else. So
what is proposed is a hack relying on an implementation bug.
2. I said warning, not error.
See CUAP
http://www.w3.org/TR/cuap
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 11:34:52 UTC