W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > October 2012

Re: transfer of URI/WebID ownership

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:34:56 -0400
Message-ID: <50755D60.2090509@openlinksw.com>
To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 10/10/12 5:12 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> But I think the question is here: is a 301 also a signal of a change of WebID, since
> the document has moved permanently, do #uris in the old document also need to be
> moved permanently?
> Henry

Should it matter how routing occurs if the end result is a WebID and 
public key association that mirrors what's in the X.509 certificate? The 
protocol is about entity relationship semantics extending a TLS 
handshake.  The Linked Data URI just does its thing since name based 
*indirection* is intrinsic.



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 11:35:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:56 UTC