- From: Jürgen Jakobitsch <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:11:29 +0100 (CET)
- To: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>
- Cc: public-xg-webid@w3.org
peter, could you please tell me, what exactly makes the site "totally dead"? the only javascript on the page is the logout script (see source). first, it is more or less the same as on henry's site (it doesn't return true or false, but that's all) and second, the script has been there from the very beginning. between your first test on ie (see screeny [1] ) and the last one there was no change javascript-wise. wkr j [1] https://yorkporc.wordpress.com/2012/01/02/lets-test-webid-realm-with-webid/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Williams" <home_pw@msn.com> To: "Jürgen Jakobitsch" <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at> Cc: public-xg-webid@w3.org Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2012 1:38:13 AM Subject: Re: Thankyou for saving my sanity... Since you followed folks advice on Ajax and https, the site is totally dead to ie (9). I had to use opera... Instead. Ie used to work... Ie allows me to test trust path discovery. When I have a root and a server cert (but a missing intermediary very or an intermediate that is invalid) windows goes looking at the end Certs URL to rebuild the local chain (following the back pointers, and observing constraints in the Certs policy statements) eg only chain through those anchors offering the eu qualified very assurance (as well as server key usage bit).. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 6, 2012, at 3:53 PM, "Jürgen Jakobitsch" <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at> wrote: > :) welcome! > > and if you care about your depiction simply add one to your profile or > add foaf:gender = male to display the even more beautiful male dummy image. > > wkr j > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Williams" <home_pw@msn.com> > To: "j jakobitsch" <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at>, public-xg-webid@w3.org > Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2012 12:48:31 AM > Subject: Thankyou for saving my sanity... > > > http://tinyurl.com/7luhnnv > > Your debug output gave the clue, and W3C validator did the rest. > > All along it was a &, vs an "&" > > not only is there name/address duality, there is duality of encodings of meta-characters in the meta documents descirbing resources, bearing addresses that may be names (or not). > > -- > | Jürgen Jakobitsch, > | Software Developer > | Semantic Web Company GmbH > | Mariahilfer Straße 70 / Neubaugasse 1, Top 8 > | A - 1070 Wien, Austria > | Mob +43 676 62 12 710 | Fax +43.1.402 12 35 - 22 > > COMPANY INFORMATION > | http://www.semantic-web.at/ > > PERSONAL INFORMATION > | web : http://www.turnguard.com > | foaf : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard > | skype : jakobitsch-punkt > -- | Jürgen Jakobitsch, | Software Developer | Semantic Web Company GmbH | Mariahilfer Straße 70 / Neubaugasse 1, Top 8 | A - 1070 Wien, Austria | Mob +43 676 62 12 710 | Fax +43.1.402 12 35 - 22 COMPANY INFORMATION | http://www.semantic-web.at/ PERSONAL INFORMATION | web : http://www.turnguard.com | foaf : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard | skype : jakobitsch-punkt
Received on Saturday, 7 January 2012 13:11:59 UTC