- From: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:24:28 +0200
- To: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
- CC: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
My proposals to references in WebID spec: 1. section 2.1: "Alternate RDF serialization formats, such as N3 [N3] or Turtle [TURTLE], may be supported by the mechanism providing the WebID Profile document." Most N3 documents is compatible with the Turtle (Turtle is subset of N3). These simple solutions like WebID most used Turtle. I believe that there is no need to list here N3, especially when it is not a complete list of serializations. Additionally, RDF Working Group concludes that they will not standardize N3 (they focus on Turtle). 2. section 2.1 - the same paragraph I propose to add RDF serbialization based on JSON. It is more It is often used in web environments. I propose RDF/JSON [1]. RDF/JSON is created by RDF Working Group. 3. I suggest to change Turtle references to more actual [2] [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-json/index.html# [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/ Best, Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 09:24:56 UTC