- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:40:39 +0200
- To: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Cc: Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com>, WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@fundacionctic.org>, foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
2011/10/14 Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>: > > On Oct 14, 2011 9:15 AM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Ok, >> >> It looks like we have enough implementers and other who like cert:key . >> I'll replace the cert:public_key with it. >> When we have a few implementations we can then remove the "unstable" >> flags. >> >> Does someone want to take on the task of rewriting the examples in the >> spec to use cert:key instead of cert:identity ? > > I have a branch on github with the inverse cert:identity, just need to > update to the new property name. I guess I could commit it right away to the > main repo since we have reached consensus now... Perhaps we need a way to change fields and deprecate old ones for a period of time (to allow active implementors to catch up). I think maybe WebID will work best if it's agile... > > Steph. > >> >> Henry >> >> >> On 14 Oct 2011, at 14:52, Sergio Fernández wrote: >> >>> +1 for me as well to cert:key >>> >>> El 13/10/2011 21:05, "Andrei Sambra" <andrei@fcns.eu> escribió: >>>> >>>> +1 for me as well. Good, elegant solution. >>>> >>>> I can't comment on it too much, but I'm trying to follow this topic. >>>> >>>> Andrei >>>> >>>> Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 13.10.2011 14:41, Henry Story wrote: >>>>> > cert key has my +1 too. >>>>> +1 for key:cert >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk >>>>> >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> foaf-protocols mailing list >> foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org >> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols > > _______________________________________________ > foaf-protocols mailing list > foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols >
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 13:41:16 UTC