Re: [foaf-protocols] Final -- cert:key accepted

On 14 Oct 2011, at 15:30, Melvin Carvalho wrote:

> 2011/10/14 Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com>:
>> Ok,
>>    It looks like we have enough implementers and other who like cert:key .
>> I'll replace the cert:public_key with it.
>> When we have a few implementations we can then remove the "unstable" flags.
>>    Does someone want to take on the task of rewriting the examples in the
>> spec to use cert:key instead of cert:identity ?
> 
> Is now a good time for other clean up?
> 
> public_exponent -> exponent?

I'd +1 that

> 
> add PrivateKey class?

that's ok. 

But perhaps we should do that in another thread. You can start a proposal on public_exponent. And we can vote on that here and discuss it on Monday.

Henry


> 
> obvious use case, your protected private key on your local device is
> to be used by a robot to perform tasks for you
> 
> there's also a nice feature with most private keys that they are
> protected by a passphrase ... on the GPG mail list this week, someone
> offered to post his private key in the new york times, he was that
> confident of the strength of his passphrase! :)
> 
>> Henry
>> 
>> On 14 Oct 2011, at 14:52, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>> 
>> +1 for me as well to cert:key
>> 
>> El 13/10/2011 21:05, "Andrei Sambra" <andrei@fcns.eu> escribió:
>>> 
>>> +1 for me as well. Good, elegant solution.
>>> 
>>> I can't comment on it too much, but I'm trying to follow this topic.
>>> 
>>> Andrei
>>> 
>>> Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 13.10.2011 14:41, Henry Story wrote:
>>>>> cert key has my +1 too.
>>>> +1 for key:cert
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Dominik 'domel' Tomaszuk
>>>> 
>> 
>> Social Web Architect
>> http://bblfish.net/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> foaf-protocols mailing list
>> foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
>> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/