Re: [foaf-protocols] cert:key was: Vote: public_key, publicKey, hasPublicKey, pubKey

On 13 Oct 2011, at 15:30, Melvin Carvalho wrote:

> On 13 October 2011 14:41, Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On 13 Oct 2011, at 14:37, Toby Inkster wrote:
>> 
>>> Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 13 Oct 2011, at 14:06, Toby Inkster wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Checked in support for cert:pubKey to my repo...
>>>>> http://goddamn.co.uk/svn-web/perlmods/revision?rev=977
>>>> 
>>>> Goddamn that's fast!
>>>> 
>>>> Ok. Can we then go for just cert:key ?
>>> 
>>> http://goddamn.co.uk/svn-web/perlmods/revision?rev=978
>>> 
>>> Would have been faster but I was eating some clementine.
>> 
>> ok. So I think cert:key has traction here, with 10 votes for by Toby Inkster. I think all the other
>> votes only count as 1, and don't quite add up to 20, as cert key has my +1 too.
> 
> Happy to go with cert:key

Cool. So should I count that as 21 votes for or 30?

Henry


> 
>> 
>> Henry
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Toby A Inkster
>>> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
>>> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>>> 
>> 
>> Social Web Architect
>> http://bblfish.net/
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> foaf-protocols mailing list
>> foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
>> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 13:38:44 UTC