Re: [foaf-protocols] cert:key was: Vote: public_key, publicKey, hasPublicKey, pubKey

On 13 October 2011 14:41, Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 13 Oct 2011, at 14:37, Toby Inkster wrote:
>
>> Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 13 Oct 2011, at 14:06, Toby Inkster wrote:
>>>
>>>> Checked in support for cert:pubKey to my repo...
>>>> http://goddamn.co.uk/svn-web/perlmods/revision?rev=977
>>>
>>> Goddamn that's fast!
>>>
>>> Ok. Can we then go for just cert:key ?
>>
>> http://goddamn.co.uk/svn-web/perlmods/revision?rev=978
>>
>> Would have been faster but I was eating some clementine.
>
> ok. So I think cert:key has traction here, with 10 votes for by Toby Inkster. I think all the other
> votes only count as 1, and don't quite add up to 20, as cert key has my +1 too.

Happy to go with cert:key

>
> Henry
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Toby A Inkster
>> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
>> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>>
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org
> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols
>

Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 13:31:19 UTC