- From: Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernandez@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:25:49 +0200
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>, WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Hi, first of all I'd like to say that my intention was not to move the discussion about which tool should be used. There are many, but for this concrete purpose I think is more effective to patch the tool currently used. I'll try to take a look today. 2011/10/5 Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>: > A few questions: > Is that UI skinnable? Yes, you can customize the CSS (check under 'more options' on the form). In the report provided I generated it with the W3C TR-ED CSS, but since the markup is not compatible the effect is not so visible. But yes, provide a compatible stylesheet you can obtain what you want. > Is that something that one can turn into a document that one could just put into CVS? The tool doesn't provide such feature, but it's on the roadmap. Meanwhile you can save the report directly from the browser, although you'd have some issues with relative references to javascript or images. > Do you think that this is something that the W3C wants to deploy in one go for all its ontologies? That seems very ambitious... not sure what to think. > As I remember Sergio you are working on J2EE. There are already Xsparql implementations in Java, so that could be of interest to you... Yes, XSPARQL is a cool technology, and we have experience with it. In fact, we (CTIC) collaborated in the W3C member submission of XSPARQL. Cheers, -- Sergio Fernández CTIC - Technological Center Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Gijón C/ Ada Byron, 39 Edificio Centros Tecnológicos 33203 Gijón - Asturias - Spain Tel.: +34 984 29 12 12 Fax: +34 984 39 06 12 E-mail: sergio.fernandez@fundacionctic.org http://www.fundacionctic.org Privacy Policy: http://www.fundacionctic.org/privacidad
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 08:26:17 UTC