W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > May 2011

Re: WebID video and demo

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 16:53:21 -0400
Message-ID: <4DC30E41.6050901@openlinksw.com>
To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 5/5/11 2:21 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
> The storage mechanism in our particular implementation was chosen just
> because it was the simplest way to implement what we wanted. There is
> nothing, as far as we can see, that should couple the storage mechanism
> to the WebID specification. So yes, we can give people that choice - but
> many people are just going to choose the default.

This matter is becoming a top priority now that some infrastructure 
failure points have been addressed. For example, you can use HTML5 WebDB 
to talk SPASQL to a data space (which can take the form of an RDBMS, 
Graph DBMS, a file etc..). The channel question will be secured too via 

What we'll end up doing is making Flash storage an option :-)


- HTML5 WebDB to ODBC Bridges (so SPASQL has a pinhole and more )



Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2011 20:53:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:39:45 UTC