- From: László Török <ltorokjr@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:23:42 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTin1SgKV38hFFVQ_8ytoBj_deiS3SeKyfYeWB2Pv@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, I think someone mentioned the importance of the mobile space in the last call. ( Google: "mobile first" ) The most straightforward are the mobile browser, but if the client certs are available in some local certificate store (analogous to Gnome keyring) that it could be an ideal for 1000s of mobiles apps. I have certainly at least 20 different apps that require authentication, I have never managed to remember all the passwords, so I just have them remembered by the app. Is this sg that could go into the use case section of the deliverables? Regards, Laszlo 2011/1/25 Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> > As we have quite a few experts with Browser experience on our Incubator > I would like to point to some of the work we have already done in this > space. > > The ESW Wiki has a section on Clients > http://esw.w3.org/Foaf%2Bssl/Clients > > As a follow up to a longer article on identity in the browser > http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/identity_in_the_browser_firefox > > I posted ideas in the guise of a bug report in Issue 29784 on Google > Chromium > http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=29784 > > See especially the most recent posts there. (If it is a problem to have > posted > that there I can repost it here) > > The hope is that by posting these issues in public spaces the ideas would > be patent protected. Of course it would help to have this summarised > as a deliverable for this WG > > Should we perhaps collect these ideas in a note somehow? Any ideas > how one could formulate these suggestions? Is there some way we > can get more browser vendors interested in these improvements? > > Hopefully those are questions we can answer here. > > > Henry > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > >
Received on Monday, 31 January 2011 13:32:17 UTC