- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 09:19:11 -0400
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4DB02ECF.8020500@openlinksw.com>
On 4/21/11 8:41 AM, Henry Story wrote: > On 20 Apr 2011, at 23:08, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > >> Henry, >> >> Very nice! >> >> Observations re. diagram: >> >> 1. step #2 is missing arrow (inbound) from "resource server" to Bob's browser is missing re. authentication challenge >> 2. step #3 is missing arrow (outbound) indicating what happens after "OK" button is clicked. >> >> Re. OpenID, accentuating OpenID+WebID will help i.e., implying that OpenID implementers benefit immediately from WebID. It's less politically thorny than implying OpenID is inadequate (even though we know it is etc..). > yes, that us because it all happens in 1 TLS connection. Yes, we know that, but someone else would expect a <--- TLS handshake ---> visual at least when trying to grok the flow etc.. > Is this better? Yes, much clearer :-) Kingsley > Is this better? > > > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 13:19:34 UTC