- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:06:49 -0400
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 4/20/11 9:57 AM, Henry Story wrote: > On 20 Apr 2011, at 15:48, Harry Halpin wrote: > >> +1. All of these seem like fairly sensible low-hanging fruit that(I hope!) browser vendors would be interested in. So if the position paper could talk about WebID, and then have something around this last as *action items*, then >> >> The only issue may be standardizing UX across vendors, which is hard as of course browser vendors compete re UX. But saying "something should happen" (think "download buttons") is great, and then pointing how how terribly unintuitive current cert handling UX is and how parts of it (i.e. the tab handling) are just missing. >> >> If this was accompanied by screenshots across different browsers, I'd be very, very happy. > The paper can only be 5 pages long. Screenshots take a lot of place. Links in the addendum or references sections or via anchored text, as per normal practice. If you have a live link, you negate the constraints of digital rendition of paper :-) Kingsley > We were thinking of going into details in the presentation, where I hope we can get a bit more time than 20 minutes. > > > >> cheers, >> harry >> > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 14:07:12 UTC