- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:25:48 -0400
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: Andrei Sambra <andrei@fcns.eu>, public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 4/10/11 8:04 AM, Henry Story wrote: > yes, the basic test suite I am speaking of is not designed for sites like > webid.fcns.eu, but rather for auth.fcns.eu . We need to test pure WebID implementations > so that we don't need to have as much mail on the list every time someone implements webid > again:-) Andrei, That's sums up what I said to you about not wanting any IdP restrictions. WebID is about flexibility that comes from being inherently open and distributed. Nobody is in a position to subjectively assert trust. The issue of trust is derived from the logic of the system itself. In the WebID world its about the WebID, the WebID, and the WebID. That's it :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Sunday, 10 April 2011 16:26:13 UTC