- From: <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:30:01 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Evan Wallace" <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
- Cc: "David Leal" <david.leal@caesarsystems.co.uk>, "Bohms,H.M. (Michel)" <michel.bohms@tno.nl>, public-xg-w3pm@w3.org
On Friday, May 30, 2008 10:29am, Evan Wallace <ewallace@cme.nist.gov> said: > How is the Product Modeling XG planning on using the Semantic Web > languages? The above > triple messes with the OWL vocabulary. Do you care if you stay in OWL > DL or do you intend > your OWL/RDFS model for these things to be merely a schema for data in > RDF form? As an OWL reasoner vendor (see http://pellet.owldl.com), these questions get to my primary concerns, namely, that OWL be a good fit for product modeling, but that we try to stay within OWL DL, chiefly OWL2 DL (or whatever OWLWG ends up calling it). To that end, re: measurements & units, I think we should (1) make sure that OWLWG knows, formally, that we have use cases & requirements for, say, n-ary datatype predicates; and (2) that we try, inasmuch as possible, to make our measurement & unit "stuff" fit what OWL2 will provide. Evan, since you're on both groups, I hope you'll be able to help both understand the situation of the other, in cases (like this) where there's overlap. Cheers, Kendall Clark
Received on Friday, 30 May 2008 15:30:41 UTC