- From: Markus Stocker <markus.stocker@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 18:23:33 +0300
- To: Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: public-xg-ssn@w3.org
Hi Alejandro, Could something like this work? :o1 rdf:type ssn:Observation . :o1 ssn:observedBy :mySensor1 . :o1 ssn:observedProperty :magnitude . :o1 ssn:featureOfInterest :earthquakePhenomenon . :o1 ssn:observationResult :sensorOutput1 . # -> links to the observation value :o2 rdf:type ssn:Observation . :o2 ssn:observedBy :mySensor2 . # Possibly :mySensor1 :o2 ssn:observedProperty :depth . :o2 ssn:featureOfInterest :earthquakePhenomenon . :o2 ssn:observationResult :sensorOutput2 . # -> links to the observation value Cheers, Markus On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Alejandro Llaves <allaves@fi.upm.es> wrote: > Hi all, > > I read in the group's final report [1], section 5.3.6.1 Observation module, > the following: "Observations of multiple features or multiple properties of > the one feature should be represented as either compound properties, > features and values or as multiple observations, grouped in some appropriate > structure." > > Is there any working example where the SSN ontology is used with > observations involving multiple properties, and thus multiple values? > > In our case, we are struggling with earthquake observations that include > properties such as magnitude and depth, which belong to the same FOI: the > earthquake phenomenon. > > Any thoughts on this? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/XGR-ssn/ > > Alejandro > > -- > Alejandro Llaves > > Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) > > Facultad de Informática > > Universidad Politécnica de Madrid > > Avda. Montepríncipe s/n > > Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain > > http://www.oeg-upm.net/ > > > allaves@fi.upm.es
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2014 15:24:02 UTC