- From: <P.Barnaghi@surrey.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:49:04 +0100
- To: <Michael.Compton@csiro.au>, <public-xg-ssn@w3.org>
Hi Michael, In SensorBasis_withSurvivalAndOperationalRange OWL file, it seems some of the classes like StorageCapacity, OperatingRange have no defined property. Also another question, in protocols like ZigBee there is a possibility to define a sensor node as a Router in a wireless sensor network, or a sensor node could be used as a storage hub for replicating the data in some WSN designs. Do you think we should add theses type of attributes to the model? Regards, Payam -----Original Message----- From: public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael.Compton@csiro.au Sent: 22 June 2010 14:00 To: public-xg-ssn@w3.org Subject: operating and survival conditions I've marked up Payam's suggestion for operating and survival conditions into an OWL file (as an extension of the current version of the ontology). See http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/Operating_Model I hope I've interpreted it properly. All comments welcome - Payam, if you see anything amiss let me know. On the same page is an example that encodes the operating and survival conditions for a sensor. Both files are attached here. Michael
Received on Friday, 25 June 2010 13:49:35 UTC