Re: Comments to the ontology attributes

Raúl,

These ideas have been added to the attributes list.

John


On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:54 AM, Raúl García Castro wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I have a couple of comments regarding the ontology attributes that  
> we are using to describe the ontologies:
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/SSN_Suggested_Key_Ontology_Intro_Attributes
>
> In the ontology attributes we already take into account some aspect  
> of the ontology quality: that the ontology is well documented.
> Nevertheless, from our experience, there are other aspects that are  
> highly relevant such as the lack of anomalies (redundancies,  
> inconsistencies, etc.) in the ontology, which are important to know  
> to decide whether to reuse some ontology or part of it.
>
> Also, regarding the reliability (trust) of the ontology, now we  
> already consider if the ontology is maintained/supported by some  
> organization and its adoption.
> In this case, other relevant factors could be if the model described  
> by the ontology is supported by some theory and if the ontology has  
> been formally evaluated.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -- 
>
> Dr. Raúl García Castro
> http://delicias.dia.fi.upm.es/~rgarcia/
>
> Ontology Engineering Group (http://www.oeg-upm.net/)
> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
> Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid
> Phone: +34 91 336 36 70 - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19
>


John

--------------
John Graybeal   <mailto:graybeal@mbari.org>  -- 831-775-1956
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org

Received on Friday, 10 July 2009 18:15:22 UTC