- From: Cory Henson <coryhenson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:48:09 -0400
- To: Simon Cox <simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
- Cc: Michael.Compton@csiro.au, public-xg-ssn@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bc34b7450908130648s6c5ceae5o77bb3c674afa161e@mail.gmail.com>
Understand, but wanted to make the jump to the data level so that I could ask how these were translated to RDF. Perhaps I was sloppy in the example and relied too heavily on the semantics of "..." (or too lazy to write a lot of XML :) Below may be a better translation: <Description rdf:about="#foo" rdf:type="CompositePhenomenon "> ... <component rdf:resource="http://example.org/R3"/> ... </Description> <Description rdf:about="#R3_inst" rdf:type="R3"> <value>42.0</value> </Description> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Simon Cox <simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu>wrote: > Ah - I wonder if there is some crossed wires here. > Phenomenon and SWE Records are at different meta-levels, and appear in > different places in the O&M model. > > 1. The Phenomenon schema/model provides for the description of a phenomenon > type. > The 'observed-property' in O&M-speak. A column-heading in a conventional > tabular representation of a data-set. > > 2. the SWE Common schema provides for records to contain values. > The 'result' in O&M-speak. A cell contents in a conventional tabular > representation. > > There is a link, of course, and a swe: record will typically point to the > Phenomenon instance that describes its structure and meaning. > But you do not find a swe:value inside a Phenomenon instance. > > > Simon Cox > > European Commission, Joint Research Centre, > Institute for Environment and Sustainability, > Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit, TP 262 > Via E. Fermi, 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy > Tel: +39 0332 78 3652 > Fax: +39 0332 78 6325 > mailto:simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu <simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu> > http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/simon-cox > > SDI Unit: http://sdi.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ > IES Institute: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ > JRC: http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org] > *On Behalf Of *Cory Henson > *Sent:* Thursday, 13 August 2009 15:20 > > *To:* Simon Cox > *Cc:* Michael.Compton@csiro.au; public-xg-ssn@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: Survey paper > > Simon, > > How are data values translated to RDF? For example, > > <CompositePhenomenon gml:id="foo"> > ... > <component xlink:href='http://example.org/R3'/<http://example.org/R3%27/> > > > ... > </CompositePhenomenon> > ... > <swe:encoding> > <swe:AsciiBlock decimalSeparator="." tokenSeparator=",", > tupleSeparator=" "/> > </swe:encoding> > ... > <swe:value> > ... 42.0 ... > </swe:value> > > to > > <Description rdf:about="#foo" rdf:type="CompositePhenomenon "> > ... > <component rdf:resource="http://example.org/R3"/> > ... > </Description> > <Description rdf:about="#R3" rdf:type="..."> > <value>42.0</value> > </Description> > > > I know there are different record formats (<swe:record>) that may be more > easily annotated, and thus provide a more clear translation, but in general > is there a standard way to map the values to RDF? > > -Cory > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Simon Cox <simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu>wrote: > >> 'model reference to a ontological description' vs 'composition by >> inclusion of remote resources' >> >> Not sure. The emphasis is a little different. >> I understand the intention of 'annotation' is to add some richer >> description, as an adjunct to something local. >> The intention of the latter is not to have anything local, just a pointer >> to a remote resource. >> Augmenting vs deferring the description. >> >> The mapping to RDF is straightforward. >> GML was actually modelled on the RDF meta-model (though the XML syntax is >> not the same - that's history). >> Lower-case XML elements (e.g. component) are RDF properties, while the >> upper-case XML elements (e.g. CompositePhenomenon) are RDF Resources. >> So when you see >> >> <CompositePhenomenon gml:id="foo"> >> ... >> <component xlink:href='http://example.org/R3'/<http://example.org/R3%27/> >> > >> ... >> </CompositePhenomenon> >> >> think >> >> <Description rdf:about="#foo" rdf:type="CompositePhenomenon "> >> ... >> <component rdf:resource"http://example.org/R3"/> >> ... >> </Description> >> >> or >> >> <Description rdf:about="#foo" rdf:type="CompositePhenomenon "> >> ... >> <component> >> <Description rdf:about="http://example.org/R3" >> rdf:type="SimplePhenomenon> >> ... stuff ... >> </Description> >> </component> >> ... >> </Description> >> >> (Apologies for the dodgy RDF/XML.) >> >> >> >> Simon Cox >> >> European Commission, Joint Research Centre, >> Institute for Environment and Sustainability, >> Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit, TP 262 >> Via E. Fermi, 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy >> Tel: +39 0332 78 3652 >> Fax: +39 0332 78 6325 >> mailto:simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu <simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu> >> http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/simon-cox >> >> SDI Unit: http://sdi.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ >> IES Institute: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ >> JRC: http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org] >> *On Behalf Of *Cory Henson >> *Sent:* Thursday, 13 August 2009 14:27 >> *To:* Simon Cox >> *Cc:* Michael.Compton@csiro.au; public-xg-ssn@w3.org >> *Subject:* Re: Survey paper >> >> Hi Simon, >> >> Thanks for the comment. We are using the term semantic annotation as >> described in SAWSDL, as a model reference to a ontological description. >> Does this conflict with the description as a 'composition by inclusion of >> remote resources'? As far as mapping to RDF, this is in comparison to RDFa >> which has a known syntactic translation from the set of annotations to RDF >> triples. While xlink:href maps to rdf:resource, how would the values of >> properties of this resource be translated to RDF? If this is not correct, or >> the wording is awkward, please point us in the right direction. Thanks for >> your help. >> >> -Cory >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Simon Cox <simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu>wrote: >> >>> Hi Mike - >>> >>> A clarification relating to semantic annotations and xlink: >>> >>> In GML-style XML documents, xlink:href plays the same role as >>> rdf:resource >>> in an RDF/XML document. >>> I.e. it holds a pointer to external resource, which could be pasted >>> inline >>> as an anonymous node with equivalent semantics. >>> This is a basic GML pattern and is explained in the GML spec >>> http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=20509 clause 7.2.3. >>> The examples involving xlink:href in Figure 2 aren't exactly >>> 'annotations', >>> more 'composition by inclusion of remote resources'. >>> >>> So I'm not sure if the example supports the point you are making. >>> >>> You comment 'XLink has no predefined mapping to RDF.' >>> As mentioned above, _as used in GML documents_ xlink:href maps to >>> rdf:resource. >>> >>> Simon Cox >>> >>> European Commission, Joint Research Centre, >>> Institute for Environment and Sustainability, >>> Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit, TP 262 >>> Via E. Fermi, 2749, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy >>> Tel: +39 0332 78 3652 >>> Fax: +39 0332 78 6325 >>> mailto:simon.cox@jrc.ec.europa.eu >>> http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/simon-cox >>> >>> SDI Unit: http://sdi.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ >>> IES Institute: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ >>> JRC: http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-ssn-request@w3.org] >>> On >>> Behalf Of Michael.Compton@csiro.au >>> Sent: Thursday, 13 August 2009 13:43 >>> To: public-xg-ssn@w3.org >>> Subject: Survey paper >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Sorry it's so close to the SSN'09 deadline, but with help from Cory and >>> Holger, I (finally) have a survey paper. Please read, comment, etc. >>> >>> (there are a couple of obvious tweaks/FIXME's yet to be made) >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cory Andrew Henson >> Kno.e.sis Center, Wright State University >> http://knoesis.wright.edu/researchers/cory/ >> > > > > -- > Cory Andrew Henson > Kno.e.sis Center, Wright State University > http://knoesis.wright.edu/researchers/cory/ > -- Cory Andrew Henson Kno.e.sis Center, Wright State University http://knoesis.wright.edu/researchers/cory/
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 13:48:53 UTC