- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:10:23 +0200
- To: Mischa Tuffield <mischa.tuffield@garlik.com>
- Cc: "public-xg-socialweb@w3.org XG" <public-xg-socialweb@w3.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, VF-Group Appelquist Daniel <Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com>
On 8 October 2010 18:48, Mischa Tuffield <mischa.tuffield@garlik.com> wrote: > Hi All, > I have made a bunch of language fixes to the wiki (which there are quite a > lot of to be frank), which I am not going to elaborate upon here, find below > a list of concerns/comments I have which I feel should be addresses before > the final report freezes: > I have also inject a bunch of comments into the wiki search for : > (@@QUESTION > 1. Webfinger is mentioned in parts of the document, but doesn't get > described in full in section: Identity Standards, and probably should get > its own section. Currently there is a bit of text in the OpenID section, I > think it should get its own subheading. > 2. Para 3 of the "State of the Social Web", states that OpenID came out of > the IIW workshops, is this the truth ? OpenID was originally a FOAF based protocol, called Yadis by bradfitz at livejournal. http://community.livejournal.com/lj_dev/683939.html Soon after the IIW community became more involved with steering which lead the the Foundation we have today. > 3. In section "Problems: Usernames and Passwords are insecure", there is > mention of the problem that "most names are taken", I don't understand this, > surely there are more Strings available to be used than there are URIs ?!? > 4. In the identity standards section, there is mention of OAuth, I am not > sure OAuth is an identity standard, if anything OpenID connect is trying to > merge OAuth and OpenID. In my books OAuth is a standard method of providing > access to private resources on the web, and has very little to do with > Identity! > 5. Infocard section. In the 2nd paragraph, there is mention of how InfoCards > are "relatively secure", I don't understand this statement. > 6. In the "Profiles" section, "Problem: Can't describe yourself", there is > mention of a figure, either this section should be deleted or the figure > should be found. I think the important parts of this section could be > stripped out and but in the "Accessibility" section of the final report. > Sorry, this took so long, I wasn't expecting this to take me this long, > there was quite a lot of editing which needed doing :) > Mischa > ___________________________________ > Mischa Tuffield PhD > Email: mischa.tuffield@garlik.com > Homepage - http://mmt.me.uk/ > Garlik Limited, 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW > +44(0)845 652 2824 http://www.garlik.com/ > Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 > Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD > >
Received on Friday, 8 October 2010 17:10:57 UTC