- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:31:48 +0100
- To: Döhler, Anita, VF-Group <Anita.Doehler@vodafone.com>
- Cc: public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <9178f78c1001270931q7a27744fr2f68ac0fd6b1039f@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:17 PM, "Döhler, Anita, VF-Group" < Anita.Doehler@vodafone.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > We think a definition of high level principles which constitute the Social > Web would be useful in the context of defining the framework for the Social > Web and its concepts. > > Attached/below a proposal of so far 5 principles for dicsussion on the > mailing list and/or at the next SWxG telcon. > > High level principles > > 1. What you see depends on who you are. > DKA mentioned today some potential further discussion on point (1). So perhaps this may be better in a dedicated thread but the immediate questions I have are: 1. Will having a different veiw, depending on who you are, be necessarily be RESTful? 2. Is being RESTful a pre-requisite, in general? > > 2. Once defined, you can use your connections and relationships, > across different Social Networks or Social Applications. > > 3. You can expose your content (User Generated Content) to different > Social Networks or Social Applications, without the need to store the > content in these networks/applications. > > 4. You can define the access control on a per item basis, either per > contact, or per group. > > 5. You can communicate with connections no matter which Social Network > or Social Application you share. > > > Looking forward to hearing your comments w/r the need of agreeing on high > level principles & their concrete content/wording, > > Regards > Dan (A) & Anita > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 17:32:21 UTC