- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:07:27 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>, public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:45:32 +0200 Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > Meta question: do we think the "prefix=" variant on xmlns= is stable > enough to encourage people to use? I'm on the RDFa working group, but the following is my personal assessment, not an official reply from the WG. @prefix is pretty sure to become an RDFa feature, but the syntax of the attribute value is not set in stone. There were objections (including from me) about colons being used as the delimiters between URIs and prefixes, given that URIs (not just can, but always do) contain colons. We settled on the syntax in the FPWD as an interim agreement, but that discussion is not yet over. > Are parsers supporting prefix= ? Latest development version of my parser does; and Ivan's (PyRDFa) too. Perhaps others. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 08:09:15 UTC