- From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:48:29 +0900
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
Le 28 avr. 2010 à 01:57, Toby Inkster a écrit : > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:18:04 +1000 > Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au> wrote: > >> Disappointing in that they ignore the past and "reinvent" a new >> namespace for already well established semantics.... > > The bigger point is that > they chose to reuse RDF rather than inventing their own proprietary > markup. Also, message from David Recordon on Sam Ruby's blog At http://intertwingly.net/blog/2010/04/21/Open-Graph-Protocol#c1271977935 The meta tags are intentional; they come from the RDFa syntax spec ([link]). We’re not exactly using the tags as intended by the Semantic Web community, but think that it’s the right balance between developer simplicity and standards. -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:49:03 UTC