- From: Christine Perey <cperey@perey.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:37:53 +0200
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- CC: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
Hi, So far, as Harry asks in the original title of this thread (Statistics?) nothing I have read or heard on this topic has been quantitative. Once again METRICS are missing. From what I am hearing on the mobile social networking side, communities report that membership growth is continuing as is engagement (though measurements of engagement remain elusive). Could it be that people are unwilling to use social network services ONLY while parked (sedentary) in front of their PCs and that the mode of access is migrating? Those who are unwilling to migrate to mobile access mode are dropping entirely. And they have more time to speak with the Wall Street Journal or New York Times writers. Also, I think that the content and user experience of a general purpose (what I call "flat") community service (e.g., Facebook) makes it more challenging to hold the member's attention in comparison with the more focused community services (focusing on meeting a specific human need, e.g., dating, games, finding a good place to eat or hang out, find a job in your neighborhood). Mobile-centric communities have, in general, tended to begin more focused on one or a small number of specific human needs, certainly more focused than Facebook. -- Christine cperey@perey.com mobile +41 79 436 68 69 VoIP (from US) +1 (617) 848-8159 Skype (from anywhere) Christine_Perey Karl Dubost wrote: > > Le 3 sept. 2009 à 14:13, Harry Halpin a écrit : >> reasons for leaving in general? >> [1] http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/magazine/30FOB-medium-t.html > > > > 1. One's own social network has moved to another site. You are a > follower or a pioneer > Remember Orkut migrations, friendster, twitter, etc. > 2. The new policy of the social network doesn't make people happy (ex: > Facebook policies change in the past) > 3. A small social network is being bought by a bigCo and people don't > want to be part of it anymore (ex: Flickr bought by Yahoo!) > 4. Some people realize that they spent far too much time on it and the > only way to be reasonable is to quit completely. > > And certainly other reasons. >
Received on Friday, 4 September 2009 07:38:35 UTC