- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:43:43 +0300
- To: "public-xg-socialweb@w3.org" <public-xg-socialweb@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-social-web-talk@w3.org" <public-social-web-talk@w3.org>
In HTML:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/weekly-agenda.html
[1]SWXG Weekly
[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/
SWXG WG Weekly
1. Convene [2]SWXG WG meeting of 2009-05-27T13:00-15:00Z (See your
[3]local time)
+ [4]Zakim teleconference bridge: Boston, USA:
[5]+1.617.761.6200 code:SWXG Nice, France:
[6]+33.4.89.06.34.99 code:SWXG Bristol, UK:
[7]+44.117.370.6152 code:SWXG ([8]zakim calendar)
o supplementary IRC chat: [9]#swxg on irc.w3.org port
6665
+ chair: HarryH or DKA
+ scribe: ??
+ roll call, comments on the agenda.
regrets: Fabien, Raphael, AlexK, DanBri
+ PROPOSED: to approve [10]SWXG WG Weekly -- 20 May 2009 as a
true record
+ PROPOSED: to meet again Wed, 3 June. scribe volunteer?
+ PROPOSED: If we keep forgetting to get scribes, to move to
a scribing list
2. General Organization
+ ACTION: [DONE] AlexPassant to create a [11]liasons list on
the Wiki and list himself for SPARQL.
+ ACTION: danbri sketch a 5 line template for interaction
with other groups (cf InvitedExperts, DiscussionTopics)
+ ACTION: karl to produce a [12]template for TF deliverables.
+ Can we get wiki pages for each of our deliverables (final
report) etc. in charter together?
3. Task Forces
+ Do we have confirmed leaders for Context and Privacy Task
Force (Karl Dubost)? For Portability and Architectures Task
Force (@@)? Has Joaquin found scoping to be better for
portability? Can we have two leaders per task force? Do we
have critical mass, and if so, can we get telecon times for
them?
+ PROPOSAL: (See [13]e-mail) Use either WBS questionnaire, or
just set them to meet one hour after (14:00 UTC) the full
telecon at 13:00 UTC, operating bi-weekly. Therefore, the
Social Web XG would de-facto have a two-hour weekly
meeting, but the second hour would always be a task force.
Would make scheduling and remembering to attend telecons
easier
+ Do the task-forces want separate telecons? Previous
thinking had all e-mnail traffic on a single list-serv. Is
there a problem with e-mail traffic on list?
4. Invited Guests
+ ACTION [DONE]: hhalpin and danbri to invite guest speakers
and investigate their schedule. See [14]wiki
+ ACTION [CONTINUES]: danbri to find someone from Opera to
talk Widgets
+ Want to make the invited guest spots problem-specific. See
[15]new wiki page of Discussion Topics for guests.
+ Review [16]list of invited experts and possible dates.
5. Creating User Stories on the Wiki
+ ACTION: danbri to document throwaway IDs on Wiki
+ What kinds of stories are missing (business and developers,
not just end-users, should be in mind)
+ ACTION: danbri write up user story about different kinds of
"single use" openids (eg. karma)
+ ACTION: oshani to document takedowns as a user story
+ What kinds of user stories are missing (business,
developers)? How do we transition user stories to use case
document? Should we try to ground out in "real-world"
use-cases that are in the news as well?
6. Invited Guest Telecon: VCard in RDF
+ One advantage of the [17]vCard in RDF format ([18]RDF
Schema here) is it's use of RDF containers to allow complex
vCard expressions. Should this be kept, and if so, how?
Which ones, rdf:bag, rdf:Alt, rdf:Seq? How about its use of
sub-structure?
+ One advantage of the [19]vCard ontology is that it clearly
delimits and lists all the RDF vocabulary terms for vCard
with domains and ranges if possible into a fairly flat
namespace. Could add back in cardinality contrainsts? What
parts of structure from vCard in RDF can be merged with
vCard ontology
+ The other syntactic difference is just one of
capitalization. Main issue is if GRDDL transform would need
updating.
+ The vCard ontology needs examples. At least one that
explains you can attach the properties to URIs for people,
not just cards!
+ Can we get a single namespace for vCard, and do redirection
to the namespace?
+ Should we update vCard to deal with newer [20]vCard IETF
work? See DanBri's e-mail for list of relevant differences.
Can someone liason with vCard IETF?
+ Is it worth tracking or making a GRDDL from new [21]IETF
vCard in XML?
+ Should we merge vCard or subset it with FOAF and
[22]Portable Contacts? Liason for PortableContacts?
_________________________________________________________
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/
[3] http://permatime.com/UTC/2009-05-27/13:00/Next_teleconference
[4] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/bridge#Zakim
[5] tel:+1.617.761.6200;postd=swxg
[6] tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99;postd=swxg
[7] tel:+44.117.370.6152;postd=swxg
[8] http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html
[9] http://irc.w3.org:6665/sxwg
[10] http://www.w3.org/2009/05/20-swxg-minutes.html
[11] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/Liaisons
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-socialweb/2009May/0103.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-socialweb/2009May/0065.html
[14] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/DiscussionTopics
[15] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/DiscussionTopics
[16] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/InvitedGuests
[17] http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf
[18] http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0
[19] http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns
[20] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev-07
[21] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dawson-vcard-xml-dtd-01
[22] http://portablecontacts.net/draft-spec.html
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 15:44:32 UTC