- From: Alex Korth <ak@ttbc.de>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:25:02 +0200
- To: Tim Anglade <tim.anglade@af83.com>
- Cc: public-xg-socialweb@w3.org
Tim, my next sentence in that email was: > On the other hand is this XG about the emerging Social Web, which is > more than just SNSs. To my understanding every site is "in" which has social > features. I quoted Boyd to disambiguate social sites in general from SNS. Are you d'accord with this? Greets, Alex Tim Anglade schrieb: > Hi all. > > Le 9 juin 09 à 16:09, Alex Korth a écrit : > >> Hi Christine, all, >> >> this is an issue that I also see as being not clarified here: what >> services are in and which are out? We should not re-invent the wheel >> here. There is a definition of Social networking sites (SNS) by Danah >> Boyd [1] which I like and which we could consider using: >> >> "We define social network sites as web-based services that allow >> individuals to >> (1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system, >> (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a >> connection, and >> (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by >> others within the system. >> The nature and nomenclature of these connections may vary from site to >> site." > > I strongly disagree with a definition in such terms. It cuts off most > BBS and anonymous social networks (which are a very interesting, if > hardly categorizable trend in current models). > > The most obvious counter-example to Danah Boyd's definition is 4chan. It > exhibits none of those features yet it's almost impossible to argue it's > not “social” or a “social network”, as it has shown (sensible) > discussion, group emergence and active collaboration. > > The removal of profiles and “friending” may be enough to remove > “network” from “social network” for some but I, for one, would argue > that a platform without explicit profiles and friending is still an > (implicit) social network that deserves to be studied and treated as such. > > > Cheers, > Tim > >> >> On the other hand is this XG about the emerging Social Web, which is >> more than just SNSs. >> To my understanding every site is "in" which has social features. To >> provide, access and share these features and their content is what I >> am interested in. >> I think we need to clarify our visions of the emerging Social Web to >> improve the fundament of our work in this group. >> Should we have a wiki page for this? For now, find my 2 cents here >> [2]. What is your visions? >> >> Cheers, >> Alex >> >> [1] http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html >> [2] http://socialconnect.info/trac/wiki/VisionVault >> >> Christine Perey schrieb: >>> I was asking myself, when populating the list of 30 popular community >>> services: What defines (for those of us in this W3C XG) a service as >>> being unequivocally on the list and why? >>> Do we all have the same definition of social networking? Judging from >>> the services on the first list on this wiki page [1], probably not. >>> I suggest that we take a stab at a W3C Social Web XG 'accepted' >>> definition of scope. >>> Playing the devils' advocate here: >>> One of the problems with a public/published W3C definition of "social >>> web" or "social networking" is that it may need to be examined >>> regularly and modified/updated. Where will the boundaries every end? >>> Social networking ("community") features are beginning to permeate >>> many other (previously non social) digital services. There are >>> already and will be more social "features" added to everything. >>> Some examples: >>> + a music (or any entertainment content) service where people rate >>> the tunes, movies, etc + a weather service in which you can see the >>> weather near your friends, >>> + a local nightclub search service on which you see where your >>> friends have already congregated, >>> + an auction service on which your friends or taste neighbors offer >>> opinions/advice before you conclude a purchase >>> Take this out into the distance and what you have is an infinite list >>> of socially-aware services. Everything is social... >>> [1] >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/TopSocialNetworkingSites >>> Christine Spime Wrangler >>> cperey@perey.com <mailto:cperey@perey.com> >>> mobile (Swiss): +41 79 436 68 69 >>> from US: +1 (617) 848 8159 >>> from anywhere (Skype): Christine_perey >>> >> -- Alexander Korth alex@ttbc.de m +49-1577-1704501
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 16:25:41 UTC