- From: Mauro Nunez <mauro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:35:10 -0500
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-xg-rdb2rdf <public-xg-rdb2rdf@w3.org>
Dear Ashok, Yes, it's ok to provide PDF as an alternative to an xhtml version. Best, Mauro On Jan 23, 2009, at 11:25 AM, ashok malhotra wrote: > Ivan, Mauro: > As you know, the RDB2RDF XG is coming to a close. We are planning > two deliverables and I thought I would run them by you for early > comments. > > 1. We have prepared a final report. This is attached. I am trying > to get permission to put it on the W3C site. > 2. We have prepared a State Of the Art Survey. This is in the form > of extensions to the ESW Wiki http://esw.w3.org/topic/Rdb2RdfXG/StateOfTheArt > or as a PDF file http://esw.w3.org/topic/Rdb2RdfXG/StateOfTheArt?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=RDB2RDF_SurveyReport.pdf > <http://esw.w3.org/topic/Rdb2RdfXG/StateOfTheArt?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=RDB2RDF_SurveyReport.pdf > >. both have the same content. Is this format acceptable for an XG > deliverable? > -- > All the best, Ashok
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 18:35:19 UTC