Re: Bi-directional mapping (RDF2RDB)

On 1/10/09 9:52 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
> Sören, All,
>
> I do support this, yes, makes a lot of sense to me. However, rather than
> referring to the (great but proprietary) work of HP I'd suggest to liaison
> with the newly chartered DAWG [1].
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/09/dawg-charter.html
>
>    
Micheal,

I would simply frame this as SPARUL which is something of a combined 
effort from OpenLink, HP, and others; with all parties being part of 
DAWG (1 and 2) :-)

-- 


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	      Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com

Received on Saturday, 10 January 2009 18:00:21 UTC