- From: Paulo Pinheiro da Silva <paulo@utep.edu>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:34:17 -0600
- To: Yolanda Gil <gil@isi.edu>
- CC: "<public-xg-prov@w3.org>" <public-xg-prov@w3.org>
Hi All, This alignment with W3C architecture is the missing point for the group to better appreciate what PML has accomplished in terms of provenance. For instance, we already have PML services wrapping key scientific repositories in the US (the USGS gravity and magnetic database, NSF-funded IRIS repository of seismic data, NCAR CHIP processes) and scientists are capable of retrieving either data or data and their provenance in form of PML. Please note that it was possible to implement these services because we spent a long time understanding these databases were put together, which kind of processing the raw data went through and so on. Another interesting result of this W3C architecture alignment is the introduction of the notion of a question/answering context. For instance, in PML, we often assume provenance to be the provenance of a resource and the resource to be the outcome of some question that was asked. For example, a person may want to know the provenance of a given route provided by a GPS system because the route appears to be incorrect. In PML, we consider to be important to encode the fact that the allegedly incorrect route was generated because this person was asking for directions between points A and B. In the example above, for instance, it may be hard or impossible to infer from an OPM provenance what was the original motivation for the system to generate such route and more specifically to know that the original goal was to get an accurate direction between points A and B. Moreover, when it comes to workflow systems, we see that workflows produce results that are not necessarily the final answer that the scientist have in mind at the time the scientist asked for workflow execution. In fact, the knowledge of this original motivation may be key for one to see what is going wrong with the derivation of a scientific product. Many thanks, Paulo. On 10/29/2010 11:21 AM, Yolanda Gil wrote: > All, > > A few months back I mentioned it would be good to have a slide > presentation of the activities in our group. I have been collecting > materials over the last few months, and I have posted such a > presentation at: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/File:Provenance-XG-Overview.pdf > > Feel free to use it, with proper credit to the group. > > I will update it once more before we finalize our activities. > > Yolanda > > > > >
Received on Friday, 29 October 2010 17:34:44 UTC