- From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:46:30 +0100
- To: "public-xg-prov@w3.org" <public-xg-prov@w3.org>
Hi All, Thanks for all your contributions to the set of suggested concepts on http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Proposal_for_a_Working_Group_on_Provenance I have went ahead and tried grouping those concepts together across the various ontologies. You can find this grouping here: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Suggested_Concepts In this grouping, I have been biased to condensing the concepts to make the most manageable list possible. For example, I have grouped all the concepts related to time under Time or for example I have grouped opm:artifact, provenier;data, and pmlp:document under Resource. I have made no distinction between classes and properties. Note, I may have put an ontological concept in the wrong grouping but I have not eliminated any concepts. According my grouping that we have roughly 19 core concepts. Today, on the call I hope we can get final consensus on these core concepts whether some should be included or not. Any comments are appreciated. I hope this is helpful. Speak to you soon, Paul
Received on Friday, 26 November 2010 14:52:23 UTC