AW: Report on the requirement presentation at the RDF Next Step Workshop

Hi Jun,

" But our requirements did have big impact on putting Named Graphs and
mechanism for naming RDF graphs high in the agenda in the group
discussions."

If this was the impact of your talk, I would say mission accomplished and
thank you again for flying to Stanford to present our requirements!

Best,

Chris


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: public-xg-prov-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-prov-request@w3.org] Im
Auftrag von Jun Zhao
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Juni 2010 01:21
An: public-xg-prov@w3.org
Betreff: Report on the requirement presentation at the RDF Next Step
Workshop

Dear all,

My slides can be found at [1]. The source file is available upon request 
but it's only in Open Office format.

The audiences are generally interested in our requirements. However, not 
unexpectedly, not all of them fell within the scope of RDF core. But our 
requirements did have big impact on putting Named Graphs and mechanism 
for naming RDF graphs high in the agenda in the group discussions.

Some draft charters came out of the workshop, which can be found at [2]. 
This will be sent out to the swig list very soon. Some kind of working 
groups might be chartered late this year or early next year.

There were a lot of tweets under the channel of #rdfn. The IRC logs can 
also be found at [3, 4, 5]

I am happy to give more updates in the next week's telecom.

[1] http://www.slideshare.net/junzhao/2010-06-rdfnext
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF_Core_Charter_2010#Graph_Metadata
[3] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/26-rdfn-irc
[4] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/27-rdfn-irc
[5] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/27-rdfn-meta-minutes.html

cheers,

Jun

Received on Monday, 28 June 2010 08:29:42 UTC