- From: Paolo Missier <pmissier@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:56:59 +0100
- To: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: "public-xg-prov@w3.org" <public-xg-prov@w3.org>
Hi Jun thank you for representing the group and for reporting! just to make sure: should I assume that the group was not concerned with SPARQL at all, and with closure operator extensions to SPARQL in particular? Cheers, -Paolo Jun Zhao wrote: > Dear all, > > My slides can be found at [1]. The source file is available upon > request but it's only in Open Office format. > > The audiences are generally interested in our requirements. However, > not unexpectedly, not all of them fell within the scope of RDF core. > But our requirements did have big impact on putting Named Graphs and > mechanism for naming RDF graphs high in the agenda in the group > discussions. > > Some draft charters came out of the workshop, which can be found at > [2]. This will be sent out to the swig list very soon. Some kind of > working groups might be chartered late this year or early next year. > > There were a lot of tweets under the channel of #rdfn. The IRC logs > can also be found at [3, 4, 5] > > I am happy to give more updates in the next week's telecom. > > [1] http://www.slideshare.net/junzhao/2010-06-rdfnext > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF_Core_Charter_2010#Graph_Metadata > [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/26-rdfn-irc > [4] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/27-rdfn-irc > [5] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/27-rdfn-meta-minutes.html > > cheers, > > Jun
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 09:34:57 UTC