- From: Paolo Missier <pmissier@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:12:40 +0100
- To: Yolanda Gil <gil@isi.edu>
- CC: "<public-xg-prov@w3.org>" <public-xg-prov@w3.org>
Hi, glad you find this workable... these are good criteria, I'll go ahead and do some tagging today we're up to 34 tagged papers but I agree that the use case ones should be the focus quick technicalities: - there is a "web page" entry type in Mendeley so we can use that and then tag them uniformly - not sure you can do stats on the tags used from within Mendeley. What I have done is sync locally and then run SQL against the local Mendeley DB and export the result to googledocs. This may be th3e best I can do as I am not sure how to make it happen automatically. Mendeley may not support that. not sure can "query" Mendeley" at all (as opposed to browsing) Also: I find that bibdata is a great publication outlet but for editing we can just stick to the Mendeley dekstop, it seems quite convenient and the sync facility allows us to work together. Cheers, -Paolo > > I would suggest that we all get more tagging done and that on the > Friday telecon we start querying the collection for each scenario to > see what obvious citations and tags may be missing. Paolo: to > facilitate this, is there a way to put a link a query URL for Mendeley > to the wiki page for each scenario? My goal is to move towards a > point where we can start to see the gaps and the relevant prior work > for each scenario through a few simple queries to Mendeley. > > Happy tagging! > > Yolanda
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2010 10:13:12 UTC