- From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:36:20 +0100
- To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- CC: Yolanda Gil <gil@ISI.EDU>, "<public-xg-prov@w3.org>" <public-xg-prov@w3.org>
Hi James, So it involves essentially trying to make a larger use case that includes some aspects from other use cases so that it encompasses some more user requirements. I think it would be good to focus on a specific domain. We're trying to use this for explanation in the requirements report. You don't need to volunteer if you don't have the bandwidth. I just think it's best if the person who takes on the the use case uses it in the domain they want. Thanks, Paul James Cheney wrote: > On Feb 19, 2010, at 5:24 PM, Paul Groth wrote: > >> Hi James and All, >> >> It seems that we have agreement on a use case e.g. a scientist uses >> linked data, processes it with a scientific workflow + some manual >> and qualitative analysis makes it available. >> >> The question seems which domain: eGovernment Public Policy or >> bioinformatics. There are benefits to both. >> >> * eGovernment has the whole push with Data.gov.uk and open government >> data, which has been really a hit with the community as a whole. >> Non-scientists can also usually understand policy type use cases. >> >> * for bioinformatics it would cement our ties with the HCLS working >> group. I know there are strong demands for provenance and several >> iniatives their trying to capture provenance type information. Also >> workflows and linked data have fairly strong user communities in the >> domain. >> >> I think the best way to solve this is who takes initiative :-) >> >> So is there anyone who would like to write up this use case (use case >> #2)? > > What is involved? I suppose that by speaking up I've volunteered, but > that's all right. > > I'm somewhat familiar with both domains (there are several > bioinformatics database curators in Edinburgh we've interacted with). > I can imagine that further in the future, the already blurry line > between public policy studies and eHealth might be even blurrier. > > Is there a reason not to do both? either > - add an eHealth/bioinformatics use case focusing on linked data > - or describing the eGov & eHealth aspects as instances of a generic > scenario ? Or would that make it too unfocused? > > --James
Received on Friday, 19 February 2010 18:36:57 UTC