- From: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:13:46 +0100
- To: public-xg-prov@w3.org
Dear all, As Yolanda said in the agenda, I'd like to talk about the state of the art for the Business Contract scenario in today's telecon. The idea would be to provoke suggestions of work relevant to the topic of this scenario. To try to make this easier, here's a summary of the particular emphases of the scenario in advance. If you can't make the telecon, suggestions by email are also welcome. Application areas: contracts, engineering processes, legal evidence Scenario goals: * Checking whether past actions comply with stated obligations * Understanding how one product is derived from another * Filtering the information revealed in provenance by privacy and ownership concerns * Discovering where two sources have a hidden mutual dependency * Resolving apparent inconsistencies in multiple accounts of the same event * Verifying that those who performed actions had the expertise or authority to do so References already thought to be relevant from related use cases and Mendeley tagging (not all yet in Mendeley, but I'm getting there): 1. Creative Commons. liblicense. 2009. 2. Reimer Y, Douglas S. Implementation Challenges Associated with Developing a Web-based E-notebook. Journal of Digital Information. 4(3). 3. Moreau L, Clifford B, Freire J, et al. The open provenance model core specification (v1.1). Future Generation Computer Systems. 2010. 4. Groth P, Miles S, Modgil S, et al. Determining the Trustworthiness of New Electronic Contracts. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Workshop on Engineering Societies in the Agents' World, (ESAW-09). Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2009. 5. Hartig O, Zhao J. Using Web Data Provenance for Quality Assessment. In: Proceedings of the 1st Int. Workshop on the Role of Semantic Web in Provenance Management (SWPM) at ISWC. Washington, USA; 2009. 6. Manjula Patel, Alexander Ball & Lian Ding. Strategies for the Curation of CAD Engineering Models. International Journal of Digital Curation 4(1), 2008 7. Rob Bracewell, Ken Wallace, Michael Moss & David Knott (2008). Capturing Design Rationale. Computer-Aided Design 41. 173–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2008.10.005 8. Paul Townend, Paul Groth, Jie Xu (2005) A Provenance-Aware Weighted Fault Tolerance Scheme for Service-Based Applications. In Proc. of the 8th IEEE International Symposium on Object-oriented Real-time distributed Computing (ISORC 2005) 9. Toyota recalls 2.3m US vehicles. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8473789.stm 10. K Eckert, M Pfeffer, H Stuckenschmidt. A Unified Approach for Representing Metametadata - Proceedings of the 2009 Dublin Core Conference, Seoul, South Korea, 2009. Thanks, Simon -- Dr Simon Miles Lecturer, Department of Informatics Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK +44 (0)20 7848 1166
Received on Friday, 20 August 2010 14:14:19 UTC