- From: Paolo Missier <pmissier@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:26:45 +0000
- To: Bertram Ludaescher <ludaesch@ucdavis.edu>
- CC: Simon Miles <drsimonmiles@googlemail.com>, public-xg-prov@w3.org
Hi Bertram I guess we can briefly discuss this tomorrow, I am sure we each have our own pet site or system for bibliography, and I am not sure I want to spend a lot of time arguing the pros and cons of each. Perhaps a view over multiple public collections, made possible by agreeing on a few tags, is all we need? Cheers, -Paolo > In my group we've been using Bibsonomy with good success: > http://www.bibsonomy.org/ > > I like the flexible export formats, including bibtex, various forms of > HTML, Jason etc. > Comes also with all of DBLP "pre-loaded", has group support, Jabref > support etc. > > What are the criteria by which we should decide on a system? > > Bertram
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 18:27:16 UTC