- From: Bertram Ludaescher <ludaesch@ucdavis.edu>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:32:12 -0800
- To: Simon Miles <drsimonmiles@googlemail.com>
- Cc: public-xg-prov@w3.org
- Message-ID: <657a810a0911120532g4954ec6aja14b95b68dda109a@mail.gmail.com>
In my group we've been using Bibsonomy with good success: http://www.bibsonomy.org/ I like the flexible export formats, including bibtex, various forms of HTML, Jason etc. Comes also with all of DBLP "pre-loaded", has group support, Jabref support etc. What are the criteria by which we should decide on a system? Bertram On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Simon Miles <drsimonmiles@googlemail.com>wrote: > Paolo, Paul, all, > > >From a brief use, I also like Mendeley and agree the group tag is a good > idea. > > Jan Reichelt from Mendeley is coincidentally coming to King's College > this coming Monday to give a seminar on it, and I'm happy to talk to > him about any issues the group has (assuming he doesn't have to run > off immediately afterwards). And if anyone who'll be in London wants > to attend the seminar, let me know and I can pass on the details. > > Thanks, > Simon > > 2009/11/12 Paolo Missier <pmissier@cs.man.ac.uk>: > > Hi Paul, > > an agreed-upon tag is a good idea. Indeed, ultimately we should not > > need to maintain a centralized collection of all papers, assuming there > > "will be" a library-wide search facility across all public collections > > within Mendeley -- I am not sure that's in place already? I have only > > been able to search within my collections, it seems. > > At that point, sensible and agreed-upon tags will suffice to create > > views across collections. > > ( That leaves us with the problem of duplicates, however) > > > > and I like the twitter tag, too :-) > > > > -Paolo > > > > Paul Groth wrote: > >> Hi Pablo and everyone, > >> > >> I also quite like Mendalay. It also sinks to citeulike.org. I was > >> thinking it would be nice to have an official tag for the xg. That way > >> on twitter, or citeulike, or wherever, we could easily collect stuff > >> together. What do you think of #provxg > >> > >> Paul > >> > >> Paolo Missier wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Yolanda Gil wrote: > >>>> * Paolo Missier to set up a repository of bibliography entries: 1) > >>>> discuss in the mailing list to converge on an approach and format, > >>>> 2) pointed to from the wiki but done in an open format that anyone > >>>> outside the Provenance Group can edit and that will be extensible > >>>> beyond the life of the Group. > >>> I have been playing with Mendeley and created an initial public > >>> collection (59 provenance papers exported from my own BibDesk > >>> collection). The result is available here: > >>> http://www.mendeley.com/collections/335902/provenance/ > >>> which we can link to from the prov-xg wiki. > >>> some of the entries are incomplete but the point is to curate them > >>> collectively and incrementally. > >>> > >>> I like the Mendeley model where you have a desktop environment which > >>> allows you to easily manage your entries locally and then sync them > >>> with public views of some of your collections. It's going through > >>> teething pains though, for example: > >>> 1- I can make my own collections public but it's read-only to the world > >>> 2- I can create a shared collection which I can invite colleagues to > >>> edit, but it's only /up to ten/ at the moment, and those collections, > >>> surprisingly, at not exposed to the web site (this should be a > >>> temporary glitch though) > >>> > >>> but we can easily get around these limitations by using (1) and > >>> creating a common account for the prov-xg group and giving the > >>> password to people who volunteer to curate the collection. I am sure > >>> a year from now collaborative editing will have improved. > >>> > >>> I like everything else, including some of the current userbase is > >>> high profile (see blog entry: > >>> > http://www.mendeley.com/blog/research-miscellanea/stanford-vs-cambridge-the-race-is-on/ > ) > >>> > >>> and their community process for collecting feedback, change requests, > >>> etc. > >>> > >>> Can you please take a look and feel free to send feedback to me or > >>> get a discussion going on this initiative > >>> > >>> thanks -Paolo > >> > > > > -- > > ----------- ~oo~ -------------- > > Dr. Paolo Missier > > Information Management Group - School of Computer Science, University of > Manchester, UK > > pmissier@cs.man.ac.uk http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~pmissier<http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/%7Epmissier> > > ----------- ~oo~ -------------- > > HAPPLE (vb.) - To annoy people by finishing their sentences for them and > then telling them what they really meant to say. > > (from The Meaning of Liff, Douglas Adams and John Lloyd) > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > -- > Dr Simon Miles > Lecturer, Department of Computer Science > Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK > +44 (0)20 7848 1166 > > >
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2009 17:24:58 UTC