- From: Chris Mills <notifications@webstandardsproject.grouphub.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:11:18 +0000
- To: J Public <public-xg-owea@w3.org>
--- Reply ABOVE THIS LINE to post a comment to the project --- Company: OWEA Project: Open Web Education Alliance Link: https://webstandardsproject.grouphub.com/C45255567 Chris Mills commented on a message: Sorry to come late to the party on this one. I agree with the flow of conversation here in general - nothing much for me to add, except to state that the Opera WSC was never supposed to contain teaching structures. I always intended it to be as fluid and granular as possible so that others can easily take it and fit it into whatever structure they want. This is why it works nicely alongside some of the InterAct courses. This is mainly in response to some of the conversation above, for example where Dave says "InterAct is very different than the materials offered by Adobe, Opera..." Just in case the purpose of WSC is not clear to everyone. Some points about the executive summary and conclusion: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/owea/wiki/Executive_Summary_White_Paper : * the bullets should be capitalized * "Pilot Programs" doesn't need capitalization * "adopt the InterAct Curriculum Framework" should be changed to something like "adopt suitable teaching resources (such as the InterAct Curriculum Framework, Opera web standards curriculum, etc.)..." - I think this is what MArk was having the issue over in the first place, and I can see why. Even though we know the truth, we need to spell it out explicitly for those who don't http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/owea/wiki/Conclusion_White_Paper : * "Alliance is focused" - "Alliance has been focused" * In the first bulleted list, the capitalization goes a bit over the top. Maybe this is just a difference of opinion in style * "adopt the InterAct Curriculum Framework" should be changed to something like "adopt suitable teaching resources (such as the InterAct Curriculum Framework, Opera web standards curriculum, etc.)..." - I think this is what Mark was having the issue over in the first place, and I can see why. Even though we know the truth, we need to spell it out explicitly for those who don't * "complimentary" - "complementary" * "of School of Web" - "of a School of Web" * "promote the use" - "promote the use of" * "allowing a preview of how clear the specification is, whether it is likely to be taught and, thereby, used in the real world" - "providing a preview of how clear the specification is, and whether it is likely to be taught and thereby used in the real world" * "accommodates for changes in leadership" - " and accommodates for changes in leadership" * "undertaking include establishing" - "undertaking includes establishing" * "and is confident" - "and are confident" * "begun work integrating pilot programs" - "begun to work on integrating pilot programs" * "future plans to expand to include if proven successful" - eh? * "incorporate aspects of the WaSP InterAct curriculum" - again, I'd mention the other stuff, like Opera WSC and Adobe material * "integrated into this curriculum collaborative" - eh? * "is based on Web standards and best practice, is a practical teaching tool and" - "are based on Web standards and best practices, are practical teaching tools, and" In future, shall I just make small changes myself? I don't want to tread on any toes. Overall the sections look really good! .......................................................................... See the original message, view this comment, and download attachments at: https://webstandardsproject.grouphub.com/C45255567 You can always check the Overview for the latest project activity: https://webstandardsproject.grouphub.com/projects/3106824/log To stop receiving emails when comments are posted to this message, visit: https://webstandardsproject.grouphub.com/posts/25375551/subscription/unsubscribe
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 14:11:58 UTC