- From: Chris Mills <notifications@webstandardsproject.grouphub.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:11:18 +0000
- To: J Public <public-xg-owea@w3.org>
--- Reply ABOVE THIS LINE to post a comment to the project ---
Company: OWEA
Project: Open Web Education Alliance
Link: https://webstandardsproject.grouphub.com/C45255567
Chris Mills commented on a message:
Sorry to come late to the party on this one.
I agree with the flow of conversation here in general - nothing
much for me to add, except to state that the Opera WSC was never
supposed to contain teaching structures. I always intended it to
be as fluid and granular as possible so that others can easily
take it and fit it into whatever structure they want. This is
why it works nicely alongside some of the InterAct courses.
This is mainly in response to some of the conversation above,
for example where Dave says "InterAct is very different than the
materials offered by Adobe, Opera..." Just in case the purpose
of WSC is not clear to everyone.
Some points about the executive summary and conclusion:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/owea/wiki/Executive_Summary_White_Paper
:
* the bullets should be capitalized
* "Pilot Programs" doesn't need capitalization
* "adopt the InterAct Curriculum Framework" should be changed
to something like "adopt suitable teaching resources (such
as the InterAct Curriculum Framework, Opera web standards
curriculum, etc.)..." - I think this is what MArk was having
the issue over in the first place, and I can see why. Even
though we know the truth, we need to spell it out explicitly
for those who don't
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/owea/wiki/Conclusion_White_Paper
:
* "Alliance is focused" - "Alliance has been focused"
* In the first bulleted list, the capitalization goes a bit
over the top. Maybe this is just a difference of opinion in
style
* "adopt the InterAct Curriculum Framework" should be changed
to something like "adopt suitable teaching resources (such
as the InterAct Curriculum Framework, Opera web standards
curriculum, etc.)..." - I think this is what Mark was having
the issue over in the first place, and I can see why. Even
though we know the truth, we need to spell it out explicitly
for those who don't
* "complimentary" - "complementary"
* "of School of Web" - "of a School of Web"
* "promote the use" - "promote the use of"
* "allowing a preview of how clear the specification is,
whether it is likely to be taught and, thereby, used in the
real world" - "providing a preview of how clear the
specification is, and whether it is likely to be taught and
thereby used in the real world"
* "accommodates for changes in leadership" - " and
accommodates for changes in leadership"
* "undertaking include establishing" - "undertaking includes
establishing"
* "and is confident" - "and are confident"
* "begun work integrating pilot programs" - "begun to work on
integrating pilot programs"
* "future plans to expand to include if proven successful" -
eh?
* "incorporate aspects of the WaSP InterAct curriculum" -
again, I'd mention the other stuff, like Opera WSC and Adobe
material
* "integrated into this curriculum collaborative" - eh?
* "is based on Web standards and best practice, is a practical
teaching tool and" - "are based on Web standards and best
practices, are practical teaching tools, and"
In future, shall I just make small changes myself? I don't want
to tread on any toes.
Overall the sections look really good!
..........................................................................
See the original message, view this comment, and download attachments at:
https://webstandardsproject.grouphub.com/C45255567
You can always check the Overview for the latest project activity:
https://webstandardsproject.grouphub.com/projects/3106824/log
To stop receiving emails when comments are posted to this message, visit:
https://webstandardsproject.grouphub.com/posts/25375551/subscription/unsubscribe
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 14:11:58 UTC