Jeff Z. Pan wrote: > > > Dear all, > > As Vassilis mentioned in today's telecon, we are expecting the > following two from authors of each use case by Feb 7 for our > interoperability deliverable [1] : > > 1) summary of semantic interoperability issue in the use case; > 2) and the use case itself (from the perspective of interoperability). > > We can leave the solutions completed later after we have some draft > about the common framework. As for the common framework, we know > pretty much about what to cover for the syntactic interoperability and > layers of interoperability, but again need inputs from *each* use case > ASAP: > > 3) common ontology/schema; Note that this is a common ontology/schema within the use case domain, such as the photo domain, the music domain. Based on these, we will work out the integrated common ontology/schema. Jeff > 4) guidelines on which standard to use for specific tasks related to > the use cases. > > Based on 3) and 4), we can start work on integration and harmonisation > of individual use case common ontology/schema and provide an > integrated common/schema. Furthermore, we will provide a simple > extensibility framework, to allow the support of other related > ontologies/schema related to the use cases we considered, and possibly > some other annotation standards that are not yet considered in our > framework. > > In short, inputs are needed and comments and suggestions are warmly > welcome :-) > > Greetings, > Jeff > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/wiki/Semantic_Interoperability > > -- Dr. Jeff Z. Pan (http://www.csd.abdn.ac.uk/~jpan/) Department of Computing Science, The University of AberdeenReceived on Thursday, 1 February 2007 19:04:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:38:50 UTC