- From: Jeff Z. Pan <jpan@csd.abdn.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 18:01:28 -0000 (GMT)
- To: public-xg-mmsem@w3.org
Minutes of MMSEM Informal Meeting at ISWC2006 on Nov 8th Chair: Jeff Z. Pan Present: Oscar Celma, Christian Halaschek-Wiener, Jacco van Ossenbruggen, Jeff Z. Pan, Giovanni Tummarello Main topics/issues: (1) Directions for the use cases and (2) Future of the XG. Jeff's vision of the XG. The Web is turning into a multimedia Web. Annotations become more and more important as they make it easier to manipulate multimedia objects. The problem now is that we have too many different standards of multimedia annotations. The Semantic Web standards seem to be able to improve the interoperability of multimedia annotation standards. The approach we use in the XG is bottom-up; i.e., we look at the interoperability issue in the use cases, then try to come up with some common framework (led by Vassilis Tzouvaras). So far we have many use cases, and in each use case we have quite a few different yet interesting problems. In this XG, the number one problem is interoperability, and we can worry about other problems later on. All agreed and suggested that we should make this point clear in the coming telecon. It is important to note that high quality deliverables on use cases and the common framework about interoperability could turn the XG into a working group on multimedia standard (see Jeff's slides [1]). When this happens, it is also possible to have the XG deliverables as the last call documents in the coming WG. This says the time we spent in the XG won't be wasted, as it usually takes quite some time for working groups to come up with last call documents; e.g., WebONT took about 15 months to produce the set of last call documents. The reason of having a working group is obvious: a recommendation on solving the interoperability issue is clearly needed. Note that we don't have to produce a complete solution in the WG. A simple and partial solution that can solve many practical problems is good enough. All agreed that setting up a WG is a right next-step for the XG, and agreed to work on their use cases on the interoperability issue and to help Vassilis on setting up the common framework. [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/talks/ICANN2006/Overview.html
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2006 18:04:32 UTC