- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:56:05 -0700
- To: "public-xg-lld@w3.org" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
In App A [1] we have: **** Value vocabularies such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, AGROVOC, the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF), Dewey Decimal Classification, and GeoNames; Metadata element sets such as Dublin Core Metadata Terms, the elements of RDA: Resource Description and Access, Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS), and the Friend of a Friend vocabulary (FOAF). **** Is there a reason that we give the acronyms for FOAF and SKOS and not for DC or RDA or LCSH and various other things in this section? It seems that we should do them all the same, no? And AGROVOC is not spelled out anywhere that I can find (even on their web page) so I guess it's a word that just happens to be upper-cased? kc [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_Section2#Appendix_A:_An_inventory_of_existing_library_Linked_Data_resources -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2011 19:56:35 UTC